If fact they explicitly stated that it would change but that a new Combat Mission would be added such that those who complete it will "on average" earn about the same as before. If the method used to calculate credits for existing Missouri owners was unchanged then WG would have said so. You should take it yourself.īack on topic. Thanks! Sorry, you're not able to ask or tell people not to respond as it's a public forward. If that is all you have to contribute to this conversation then please refrain from responding further. I do know how to comprehend the written word as evidenced by my ability to recognize and respond to your petty attempt to insult me. In MY opinion the wording of this should make anyone familiar with Wargaming's history suspicious.įear not. Players who already own the ship Missouri at the moment Update 0.10.7 goes live will, on average, earn the same number of Credits as before, a permanent combat mission that applies an economic bonus to all battles will maintain the ship’s economic value for everyone who owned Missouri prior to this change. There is no need to engage in self-flagellation. This is exactly the case in point with Missouri.
Guarantees that can't be followed up on will be picked apart and destroyed by clickbaiters (and others) creating bad PR even if it's a difference of 1%. How could they possibly guarantee it would be the same when it's being calculated based on base xp (I'm assuming it is, since all missions are like that) rather than a base boost as it is now? In order for it to continue making the proper amount for people who already have it, they've put in a permanent mission boost.
Jack a écrit :Your comment on Missouri really makes me facepalm though.
0 kommentar(er)
